The Death of Harold at the Battle of Hastings

Was King Harold slain by a Norman arrow that pierced his eye? Charles H. Gibbs-Smith adduces a powerful argument for correcting the traditional story. 

Harold Rex Interfectus Est: "King Harold is killed". Scene from the Bayeux Tapestry depicting the Battle of Hastings and the death of Harold.Harold, king of England, was killed in the fourth and last phase of the Norman attack at the Battle of Hastings in the late afternoon of October 14th, 1066. This last attack was a combined-forces assault of infantry and cavalry, with archers giving covering fire.

The earliest description of Harold’s death occurs in the Gesta Normannorum Ducum by William of Jumièges, written in or about the year 1070, in which he says “Harold himself... fell covered with deadly wounds.” Later, between the years 1099 and 1102, Baudri, Abbot of Bourgueil, wrote a poem describing a piece of embroidery in which there was shown a scene of Harold’s death in battle, where—says Baudri—the King is killed by being struck in the eye by an arrow.

It is more than probable that the embroidery described was the Bayeux Tapestry—which is as a matter of fact, an embroidery—and that the arrow-in-the-eye story started with a mis-reading of the very scene in the Tapestry that is now used as evidence of the story’s truth. Baudri was the first to say that Harold was killed by an arrow in the eye.

To read this article in full you need to be either a print + archive subscriber, or else have purchased access to the online archive.

If you are already a subscriber, please ensure you are logged in. 

Buy Subscription | Buy Online Access | Log In

Get Miscellanies, our free weekly long read, in your inbox every week

The world's finest history magazine 3 for £5