History Today Subscription Offer

Cromer: The Proconsul

John Raymond assesses the life and career of one modern history's “unswerving inflexibles”.

Political archetypes are rare indeed. Human nature being the mysterious thing it is, and events falling out as they do, history presents us with very few pure political “Characters”—using the word in its original and Theophrastean sense of a type of political human being whose behaviour is capable of being morally described and predicted.

Who would rashly undertake to explain or delineate the psychological intricacies of a Talleyrand, a Gladstone, a Lloyd George, a Franklin Roosevelt—or, indeed, almost any major public figure of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries? As against that, the unswerving inflexibles—that is, outside the courts of sanctity—are very few.

Lenin, Clemenceau and Lord Salisbury—the respective archetypes of the Revolutionary, the Patriot and the Conservative—are three examples that come easiest to mind. Now that the British connection with Egypt has been finally dissolved, our interest in Evelyn Baring, first Earl of Cromer, centres round the fact that he is pre-eminently the archetype of the British Proconsul.

One has only to examine the other candidates for this Olympian and (today) unenviable position to see how they fail by comparison. For example, John Buchan, out of personal loyalty to his old chief in South Africa, would award the prize to Lord Milner. In his autobiography (Memory Hold-the-Door, 1940) Buchan tells us that Milner “had a mind remarkable both for its scope and its mastery over details—the most powerful administrative intelligence, I think, which Britain has produced in our day.”

If, he goes on, “I may compare him with others, he was as infallible as Cromer in detecting the centre of gravity in a situation, as brilliant as Alfred Beit in bringing order out of tangled finances, and he had Curzon’s power of keeping a big organization steadily at work. He was no fanatic—his intellect was too supreme for that, but in the noblest sense of the word he was an enthusiast.”

To continue reading this article you will need to purchase access to the online archive.

Buy Online Access  Buy Print & Archive Subscription

If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.

Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.



Get Miscellanies, our free weekly long read, in your inbox every week