He always had. At Cambridge, Hosking read Modern Languages but his PhD was in Russian history (with a thesis on the Duma of 1907-14). In mid-doctorate, he took a year off to go to St Antony’s, Oxford, for a crash course on Western European history, which he didn’t feel he knew enough about. Then, with all those years of languages and variegated history under his belt (and a still-to-be completed PhD), he was offered a lectureship in yet another subject: Government. The new University of Essex did not yet have a History or Russian Studies Department so Hosking, now in his mid-twenties, found himself having to teach (and therefore learn about) Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau, comparative political cultures, input-output theory and the structures and functions of the state. With so many topics floating seductively past his purview (not to mention a year lecturing on Revolutions to huge assemblages of students in Madison, Wisconsin), a less disciplined person might easily have become lost to serious scholarship. But if others pursued the path to dilettantism, Hosking used his intellectual versatility to help fuel his guiding light, the flame of Russian history.
This article is available to History Today online subscribers only. If you are a subscriber, please log in.
Please choose one of these options to access this article:
- Purchase an online subscription
- Purchase a print and online subscription
- If you are already a print subscriber, purchase the online archive upgrade
Call our Subscriptions department on +44 (0)20 3219 7813 for more information.
If you are logged in but still cannot access the article, please contact us
- Middle East
- North America
- South America
- Central America
- Early Modern
- 20th Century
- Economic History
- Environmental History
- Food & Drink
- Historical Memory
- Science & Technology