Remembrance of Things Past

The coincidence, or otherwise, of memory and history has been a fruitful field for study for several years now, and one that has proved to be fraught with controversy and alarm.

Few people have been more active in promoting the need for Germans to face up to the historical realities of 1933-45 than the widely acclaimed novelist Günter Grass, so it is barely surprising that his sudden admission in his new autobiography that as a seventeen-year-old he spent several months in the Waffen-SS should have been greeted by dismay, anger, disappointment and general mystification.


Yet the time-lag between his first involvement in the business of coming to terms with the past and this new rev­elation is perhaps a graphic demonstration of how complex and troubling the whole process is. Many veterans have felt the need to wait sixty years or more before telling their stories of the war; and it is well known that the stories people tell of their youth can quite innocently be ‘improved’ in the retelling. Perhaps Grass should be admired for breaking through his earlier reticence, rather than cas­tigated for failing to come clean earlier.


Our article last month about the respective roles of the RAF and Royal Navy in 1940 resulted in some veterans feeling that their own memories and the undeniably heroic deeds of their old comrades were being slighted by dis­passionate historians assessing the evidence of the ‘myth’ of the Battle of Britain.


To read this article in full you need to be either a print + archive subscriber, or else have purchased access to the online archive.

If you are already a subscriber, please ensure you are logged in. 

Buy Subscription | Buy Online Access | Log In

Get Miscellanies, our free weekly long read, in your inbox every week

The world's finest history magazine 3 for £5