The siege of Rouen in 1418 was a brutal episode of medieval warfare, made worse by the fact that the city’s elderly and infirm were abandoned to a no man’s land. Daniel E. Thiery explains how the medieval mind justified such actions.
Tis certain, every man that dies ill, the ill upon his own head, the king is not to answer for it.
Shakespeare’s Henry V disguises himself on the eve of Agincourt and engages in a heated debate with a few of his men about his responsibility for their eternal salvation or damnation and that of their comrades. This memorable scene from a play that significantly hastened the lionisation of the second Lancastrian monarch is not substantiated by contemporary chroniclers. According to these writers, it was not at Agincourt, but rather almost three years later, that the cause, the culpability and even the Christian character of the monarch were most seriously called into question.
To read this article in full you need to be either a print + archive subscriber, or else have purchased access to the online archive.
If you are already a subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.