Reading History: Anglo-Saxon Kingship
Simon Keynes examines the variety of books on Anglo-Saxon rulers.
There was a time when the study of kingship in Anglo-Saxon England was largely a question of sorting the good kings from the weak and the bad, presumably to simplify matters at the Last Judgement. Assessing the personal qualities of kings on the basis of their recorded actions, and on the basis of things done by others in their name, remains an enjoyable (if dangerous) exercise, but not surprisingly the subject as a whole is now approached in a rather more sophisticated way. For example, distinctions are recognised between different grades of kingship (from subkings to overlords), and between the definition of royal power at each level; attention is given to the development of theories of kingship, and to their effect on the king's conduct of his affairs; and of course no effort is spared to work nut the details of the operation of royal government.
This article is available to History Today online subscribers only. If you are a subscriber, please log in.
Please choose one of these options to access this article:
- Purchase an online subscription
- Purchase a print and online subscription
- If you are already a print subscriber, purchase the online archive upgrade
Call our Subscriptions department on +44 (0)20 3219 7813 for more information.
If you are logged in but still cannot access the article, please contact us
- Middle East
- North America
- South America
- Central America
- Early Modern
- 20th Century
- 21st Century
- Economic History
- Environmental History
- Historical Memory
- Science & Technology