The West and the Middle East: Fierce Rivalries

Andrew Lycett untangles the complex story of how the West’s involvement in Middle Eastern affairs has been interpreted by historians.

Greetings from Baghdad: a British forces postcard, c.1916The West has recently cooled in its enthusiasm for military intervention in the Middle East. Following costly incursions into Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, there has been no stomach for military action in Syria.

That does not mean it has turned its back on the region. The Levant, West Asia, the Arab world – whatever you call it – has long been a focus of competing western cultural, political and economic interests. 

This tradition stretches back to the Crusades, though it took its modern form in the mid-19th century, after a combination of biblical scholarship and archaeological excavation fuelled renewed fascination with the Holy Land. The ensuing philosemitism coincided with the growth of political Zionism, stimulating an atmosphere sympathetic to Jewish national aspirations. 

Parallel with this strand was the realpolitik that accompanied the decline of the Ottoman Empire. Political turbulence in Egypt, the gateway to British India through the Suez Canal, encouraged Britain to take a more proactive role there from the 1880s onwards. 

To read this article in full you need to be either a print + digital subscriber, or else have purchased access to the online archive.

If you are already a subscriber, please ensure you are logged in. 

Buy Subscription | Buy Online Access | Log In

Sign up for Miscellanies, our free weekly email