Jump to Navigation

The Results of the Crimean War

By Robert Pearce | Published in History Review 2011 
Print this article   Email this article

Robert Pearce asks whether Britain benefited from the 1853-56 contest.

According to Sellar and Yeatman, in 1066 And All That, the Crimean War, as well as being caused by a number of causes, was ‘exceptionally inevitable’. The muddled thinking here nicely matches the muddle that was the war – though the first was humorous, the second horrendous. In fact, the war should never have happened. No one wanted it or knew exactly what it was about. In considering its results therefore, although we should ask the obvious question – what were Britain’s aims in entering the war and how far were they achieved? – a more fruitful area of study focuses on its unsought effects, its byproducts, in terms of journalism, political change, medicine and army reforms.

 This article is available to History Today online subscribers only. If you are a subscriber, please log in.

Please choose one of these options to access this article:

  • Purchase a online subscription and receive unlimited access to our archive for one week, one month or a year

  • Purchase a print and website subscription, giving you one year's access to all our content and 12 editions of History Today magazine.

  • If you are already a print subscriber, purchase the online archive upgrade for a year's worth of access at a reduced price

Call our Subscriptions department on +44 (0)20 3219 7813 for more information.

If you are logged in but still cannot access the article, please contact us

 

About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Subscriptions | Newsletter | RSS Feeds | Ebooks | Podcast | Student Page
Copyright 2012 History Today Ltd. All rights reserved.