Nero: The Two Versions

Michael Grant offers the tale of Rome's most infamous emperor from both his fans and detractors.

A marble bust of Nero, Antiquarium of the Palatine.

Every epoch has had its say about Nero. But perhaps the crescendo of denunciation was reached in the 19th century. De Quincey saw in Nero “the first in that long line of monsters who ... under the title of Caesars dishonoured humanity.” To Merivale he was “the despot released from all fear of God and overwhelmed at the same time with the fear of man ... who has no equal in history, to whom no analogy may be found save in the pathological annals of the scaffold.” Coming down to details, Merivale saw Nero as vulgar, timid and sanguinary—a good description, for whatever his artistic and imaginative qualities may have been, rarely has any ruler so thoroughly combined criminality with fatuousness.

To continue reading this article you will need to purchase access to the online archive.

Buy Online Access  Buy Print & Archive Subscription

If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.

Please email if you have any problems.