Saving the Forests of Revolutionary France

Forestry is a delicate balancing act between the needs of the present and those of the future. The French Revolution brought into question how France’s forests should be managed.

The Forest, by François Boucher, 1740. Bridgeman Images.

At the end of May 1787 the English agronomist and travel writer Arthur Young was in France. Crossing vast woodlands on his way to Orléans, he mused that the proportion of the French territory covered by forest must be ‘prodigious’. Young could be forgiven for this comment, for he was unaware that for decades the ministerial offices, salons, academies, and cafes of France had been awash with reports raising alarm about an impending wood famine and its potential impact on the country’s economy and naval strength. For the comte d’Essuiles, a retired army officer charged in 1786 with taking stock of the situation:

the ruin of a large part of the forests, the dearth of wood in over three-quarters of the realm, all demands that the ministry cease procrastinating and applying mild palliatives against major predicaments

While modern historians of forestry have mitigated the gravity of this alleged nationwide ‘dearth’, for contemporaries something had gone wrong, which required an immediate response from the state’s forestry administrators.

To continue reading this article you need to purchase a subscription, available from only £5.

Start my trial subscription now

If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.

Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.