Crusades: The View from the East

The popular image of crusading is derived almost entirely from western accounts of the victorious First Crusade. Yet when historians examine Byzantine sources about the campaign a very different picture emerges, argues Peter Frankopan.

Imperial bodyguard: Viking mercenaries in a 12th-century Skylitzes manuscript. AKG Images / Biblioteca Nacional, MadridOn June 7th, 1099 the knights of the First Crusade reached the imposing walls of Jerusalem, the holiest city in Christendom. The journey had been long and painful. A vast force had set out for the east nearly three years earlier, roused by a passionate call to arms by Pope Urban II, who spent months criss-crossing France to galvanise support for a massive expedition to liberate the place where Jesus Christ had lived and was crucified.

Numbering as many as 100,000 at the outset, the army had shrunk dramatically on its way to Jerusalem. Some had fallen in battle when a massive Turkish force had attacked as the westerners crossed Asia Minor in the summer of 1097; others had been slaughtered before that, when an ill-advised foray to capture a Turkish fort led to surrender and execution. Desertion, too, reduced the size of the force before it reached the Holy City, as men looked to their own safety and fled home.

To read this article in full you need to be either a print + archive subscriber, or else have purchased access to the online archive.

If you are already a subscriber, please ensure you are logged in. 

Buy Subscription | Buy Online Access | Log In

If you are logged in and still cannot read the article, please email digital@historytoday.com.

Get Miscellanies, our free weekly long read, in your inbox every week