History Today subscription

The Bradford Sweets Poisoning

As politicians consider the introduction of a sugar tax to improve the nation’s health, Harry Cunningham recalls a tragic incident from 1858, which forced the British government to rethink its regulation of pharmacists.

The Great Lozenge-Maker. A Hint to Paterfamilias by John Leech, Punch, 1858
The Great Lozenge-Maker. A Hint to Paterfamilias by John Leech, Punch, 1858

Those of us with a sweet tooth might recoil in horror at the idea of a tax on sugary food and drinks, a stick with which Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne – spurred on by healthy eating campaigner Jamie Oliver – has hit the UK food industry for not doing more to tackle the country’s growing teenage obesity crisis. A sugar tax is far from a novel idea. In the 18th and 19th centuries there were few sugar factories in the UK and, according to Ben Jonson, the cost of importing this ‘white gold’ meant that demand outstripped supply, a situation the government was happy to take advantage of by introducing a tax. Many of the arguments against a sugar tax today can be traced back to its historical counterpart.

To read this article in full you need to be either a print + archive subscriber, or else have purchased access to the online archive.

If you are already a subscriber, please ensure you are logged in. 

Buy Subscription | Buy Online Access | Log In

If you are logged in and still cannot read the article, please email digital@historytoday.com.

Get Miscellanies, our free weekly long read, in your inbox every week