‘A Mere Lawyer? No, Sir’: Lord Mansfield 1705-1793

Stephen Usherwood introduces a remarkable advocate in politics as well as in his practice; Lord Mansfield was Lord Chief Justice for thirty-two years.

Boswell, talking to Dr Johnson in 1772, suggested that the Lord Chief Justice of England, William Murray, first Earl of Mansfield, was ‘not a mere lawyer’. The Doctor replied: ‘No, sir... when he first came to London, “he drank champagne with the wits,” as Prior says. He was the friend of Pope.’ Later, the judge’s name again cropped up. Boswell reminded his friend that ‘the landlord at Ellon in Scotland said that he heard he was the greatest man in England - next to Lord Mansfield’.

‘Ay, Sir,’ said Johnson, ‘the exception defined the idea. A Scotchman could go no farther.’ This conversation took place in the spring of 1775, and yet, two centuries later, it would be hard to find a man so highly regarded by his contemporaries whose memory has been more neglected, except by lawyers.

Johnson would not, of course, allow Scotland any credit for her famous son; thinking of William’s youth as a King’s Scholar at Westminster School, he remarked: ‘Much may be made of a Scotchman, if he be caught young enough’.

To continue reading this article you will need to purchase access to the online archive.

Buy Online Access  Buy Print & Archive Subscription

If you have already purchased access, or are a print & archive subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.

Please email digital@historytoday.com if you have any problems.