Britain's Enchanted Monarchy
Tom Nairn looks at the role of the monarchy and its impact on British national identity.
Until very recently, the British monarchy was a subject puzzlingly absent from both history and sociology. Anyone could see that it was important, in a sense which combined the symbolic, the high-political and the psychological. Formally speaking the Crown has remained at the core of the unwritten constitution: regal sovereignty is vested in the Westminster Parliament, not the popular sort nearly all other modern states recognise. And below this level of haute politique the immense popularity of royalty is undeniable – a national-popular psychodrama which only an arch-philistine could seriously believe had no importance for English and British identity.
This article is available to History Today online subscribers only. If you are a subscriber, please log in.
Please choose one of these options to access this article:
- Purchase a online subscription and receive unlimited access to our archive for one week, one month or a year
- Purchase a print and website subscription, giving you one year's access to all our content and 12 editions of History Today magazine.
- If you are already a print subscriber, purchase the online archive upgrade for a year's worth of access at a reduced price
Call our Subscriptions department on +44 (0)20 3219 7813 for more information.
If you are logged in but still cannot access the article, please contact us
If you enjoyed this article, you might like these:
- Home
- Location
- Period
- Themes
- Magazine
- Subscribe
- Archive
- Ebooks
- Students
- Blogs
- Contact
Newsletter
From The Current Issue
|
Chris Millington
|
|
Hywel Williams
|
|
Nicola Phillips
|
|
Julia Lovell
|
From The Archive
|
John Kennedy’s commitment to put a man on the Moon in the 1960s is often quoted – most recently by Gordon Brown – as an inspired civic vision. Gerard DeGroot sees the reality somewhat differently. |






















