The Changing Face of British Conservatism
Decades sometimes attract epithets which indicate their most distinctive features and, barring unforeseen events, the epithet which will be applied to the 1980s in Britain can scarcely fail to include the word 'Conservative'. The General Election of June 1983 ensures that this decade is virtually certain to be dominated by Conservative governments. And, as the present Parliament re-assembles to continue its prolonged first session, the historian may be prompted to reflect that its final session – and the term of the government – should expire little short of the two hundredth anniversary of the event which did much to bring about the foundation of modern Conservatism. The outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789 – and the radical threat which this posed in the 1790s to the established political and social order in Britain as well as in France – rallied the bulk of the political nation to a defence of that order. This, then, is an appropriate time at which to consider the development of a movement which, after almost two hundred years, shows every sign of vigour and health. What have been the faces of Conservatism during this period? And does the evidence thus far of the 1980s denote the emergence of a significant new 'Thatcherite' face?
At various periods in the party's history, the defensiveness inherent in Conservatism on political and social issues has assumed a reactionary or a repressive face. This aspect was most noticeable in the 1790s themselves and in the years after 1815; in both periods, radical and reform movements were met with strong resistance. Resistance was also evident in 1831-2 when the Tory party, in opposition, threw its might – unavailingly – against the Whig Reform Bill. Tories saw this as making dangerous inroads on the political structure of the country and as presaging encroachments on landed property. In 1846, the protectionist wing of the Tory party bitterly attacked the repeal of the Corn Laws as a betrayal of the landed interest. And the Liberal reforms after 1906 likewise evoked violent resistance. If the first Reform Bill in 1831-2 had been regarded as the 'beginning of the end', the Liberal reforms were opposed as the 'end of the end': the end of the political and social pre-eminence of the old order. And there were Tories ready to die in the last ditch rather than submit to that. On all these occasions, the defensive face of Conservatism contorted itself into the diehard face.
This article is available to History Today online subscribers only. If you are a subscriber, please log in.
Please choose one of these options to access this article:
- Purchase a online subscription and receive unlimited access to our archive for one week, one month or a year
- Purchase a print and website subscription, giving you one year's access to all our content and 12 editions of History Today magazine.
- If you are already a print subscriber, purchase the online archive upgrade for a year's worth of access at a reduced price
Call our Subscriptions department on +44 (0)20 3219 7813 for more information.
If you are logged in but still cannot access the article, please contact us
If you enjoyed this article, you might like these:
- Home
- Location
- Period
- Themes
- Magazine
- Subscribe
- Archive
- Ebooks
- Students
- Blogs
- Contact
Newsletter
From The Current Issue
|
Taylor Downing
|
|
Roger Hudson
|
|
James Barker
|
|
Ed Smith
|
From The Archive
|
The Hudson's Bay Company was one of the central forces moulding the development of the vast tracts of land that today are Canada - but as Barry Gough explains here, the circumstances of its launch in 1670 also reveal much about the commercial forces, personalities and rivalries of Restoration England. |























