History Review, Issue: 29
denotes subscriber-only content. To access more than 11,000 articles in our archive, see our full range of subscription options. |
Christopher Ray welcomes the first titles of a lively new series for sixth formers and university students. |
|
C.D.C. Armstrong reviews four important publications on Tudor government and politics. |
|
David Parker defends a controversial term against its critics. |
|
Richard Rex argues that the main inspiration for the king's pick-and-mix religion was neither Protestant nor Catholic but Hebraic. |
|
In the first of a new series, profiling the issues raised by key A-level quetsions, Gareth Affleck identifies the points to discuss. |
|
Murial Chamberlain argues that current conceptions of Britain's power in the Victorian era owe more to his media management than to his foreign policy. |
|
Richard Wilkinson challenges the consensus of contempt for the Nazis' leading diplomat. |
|
Edward Royle explains how labels were used in early industrial Britain for propaganda rather than description. |
|
Derek Aldcroft argues that the statesmen of 1919 failed to act in the interests of Europe as a whole. |
|
The 1997 Julia Wood Award. The winner of the first prize is Criseyda Cox of Cheltenham Ladies' College, for the essay on Thomas Hobbes published below. |
|
Ivan Roots applies the 'new British' perspective to the 1650s. |
This Month's Magazine
